|
Post by privileged on Jun 16, 2014 15:55:36 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by bulldozer1 on Jun 16, 2014 17:01:38 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by jaketrent4 on Jun 16, 2014 17:31:03 GMT -7
This is how the bashers are getting posts deleted I believe.
|
|
|
Post by mrgreenjeans on Jun 16, 2014 17:43:10 GMT -7
Thanks Bulldozer for that informative post! Lots of good info here!
|
|
|
Post by bulldozer1 on Jun 16, 2014 20:58:48 GMT -7
Thanks Bulldozer for that informative post! Lots of good info here!
|
|
|
Post by hobowilly on Jun 17, 2014 4:02:50 GMT -7
Good Morning Folks.
Just for grins could we try an experiment today?
We should all be aware by now of the intentions of, motivations, and techniques used by Nuub. Nuub clearly has an agenda and if you read the post here regarding the Confessions of a Paid Basher you can see clearly that is what he does.
Personally I have a very low opinion of people who try to take advantage, for any reason, of others for the purpose of personal gain. I wish the practice of "shorting" could be outlawed because it really goes against the theory of Capitalism. Instead of investing in companies with the hope that they are successful, "shorters" hope, in fact bet, that a company will do poorly. In the former situation market forces will ultimately determine the fate of a company while the latter needs to plant seeds of doubt and discontent in order to achieve its goals. In my view Shorters are parasites feeding off the fears, anxieties, and naivete of the investor community and I make no apologies for my feelings. I wish I could meet Gordon Geeko in a dark alley one night.
When we respond to Nuub we are playing right into his hands. Don't think for a second that Nuub does not already know the responses to his questions. All Nuub wants is the "response" because for Nuub it equals $$. That is what Nuub does and he is very good at it. Nuub is not going to respond to anything that in any way would expose him or cause him to agree with you. Your questions will be totally ignored unless it is in "his" interest to respond.
I am continually amazed and saddened when I see the more advanced iHub members responding to him. He is like a fisherman pulling fish out of the water every time someone responds.
Does he need to be confronted regarding his lies, innuendos, and misinformation? Yes!!! Do we have to respond to him directly? No!!! The arguement has been made, and it is one that I agree with, that says we need to respond so that newbies on the site can see Nuub for what he is and, more importantly, correct the misleading information Nuub is spreading. But this can be done without a direct response. If this scenario arises the best course of action to take, I believe, is to either use the "Post New Message" function and respond with the facts to the person or if you have the ability, PM them.
I am so sick and tired of his BS and we like lemmings race for the edge and follow each other over the cliff into Nuub's trap, and if you think iHub mods and admins will come to the rescue well, as far as I'm concerned they are accomplices to Nuub's scheme.
Here is my plea: Please for one day, today June 17th, declare a moritorium on responding to Nuub and while we're at it Monesthind as well. Let's show them that WE control the iHub MCIG Message Board, not them and that they cannot use us to make money. Please do whatever you can to resist the temptation to respond or if you must, please, please do it using "Post New Message."
Hmmmmmmmmmm, I don't know what else I can say but I implore you, please D O N' T R E S P O N D right?
Cheers,
|
|
|
Post by privileged on Jun 17, 2014 7:03:33 GMT -7
Good Morning Folks.
Just for grins could we try an experiment today?
We should all be aware by now of the intentions of, motivations, and techniques used by Nuub. Nuub clearly has an agenda and if you read the post here regarding the Confessions of a Paid Basher you can see clearly that is what he does.
Personally I have a very low opinion of people who try to take advantage, for any reason, of others for the purpose of personal gain. I wish the practice of "shorting" could be outlawed because it really goes against the theory of Capitalism. Instead of investing in companies with the hope that they are successful, "shorters" hope, in fact bet, that a company will do poorly. In the former situation market forces will ultimately determine the fate of a company while the latter needs to plant seeds of doubt and discontent in order to achieve its goals. In my view Shorters are parasites feeding off the fears, anxieties, and naivete of the investor community and I make no apologies for my feelings. I wish I could meet Gordon Geeko in a dark alley one night.
When we respond to Nuub we are playing right into his hands. Don't think for a second that Nuub does not already know the responses to his questions. All Nuub wants is the "response" because for Nuub it equals $$. That is what Nuub does and he is very good at it. Nuub is not going to respond to anything that in any way would expose him or cause him to agree with you. Your questions will be totally ignored unless it is in "his" interest to respond.
I am continually amazed and saddened when I see the more advanced iHub members responding to him. He is like a fisherman pulling fish out of the water every time someone responds.
Does he need to be confronted regarding his lies, innuendos, and misinformation? Yes!!! Do we have to respond to him directly? No!!! The arguement has been made, and it is one that I agree with, that says we need to respond so that newbies on the site can see Nuub for what he is and, more importantly, correct the misleading information Nuub is spreading. But this can be done without a direct response. If this scenario arises the best course of action to take, I believe, is to either use the "Post New Message" function and respond with the facts to the person or if you have the ability, PM them.
I am so sick and tired of his BS and we like lemmings race for the edge and follow each other over the cliff into Nuub's trap, and if you think iHub mods and admins will come to the rescue well, as far as I'm concerned they are accomplices to Nuub's scheme.
Here is my plea: Please for one day, today June 17th, declare a moritorium on responding to Nuub and while we're at it Monesthind as well. Let's show them that WE control the iHub MCIG Message Board, not them and that they cannot use us to make money. Please do whatever you can to resist the temptation to respond or if you must, please, please do it using "Post New Message."
Hmmmmmmmmmm, I don't know what else I can say but I implore you, please D O N' T R E S P O N D right?
Cheers,
I agree!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2014 7:04:35 GMT -7
As part of DD on other sites such as Ihub, you often encounter posters making dire predictions of doom and gloom, imminent SEC halt of the stock, and allegations of wrongdoing by the CEO, board, and company. What is that all about? Are they doing it to help new investors avoid a huge mistake? Or is there another agenda? The answer is here: Lesson 1: Remember, BASHERS NEVER Bash A BAD STOCK. Check the boards for stocks with no potential. They never have any Bashers. Bashers only go after stocks that are moving up or have excellent potential to do so. Bashers work to bring the price down to either increase their position at the expense of others or help a Short make their bones. Read the rest here: bashershandbook.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
Post by hobowilly on Jun 18, 2014 2:07:27 GMT -7
OK, so we almost had a perfect day of non-response to our resident Bashers.
Like any other addiction one might face, in this case responding, the first few days are tough, but as someone who has experience with addictions it does get easier.
So let's try for another day of not responding directly to Nuub and others.
The Guidelines:
1. Do not respond directly to Bashers 2. If you feel a response is prudent, then reply using the "Post New Message" function. 3. If a newbie or guest responds to a Basher with a legitimate question on what has been stated by a Basher then reply directly to that person and not the Basher. Always keep in mind that admins and mods are not your friends on iHub so be super careful not to bash the Basher when responding to the newbie or guest. I can assure you that any hint of Basher bashing, no matter how well disguised, will be deleted immediately.
. . . . .and that's it!!! Not so difficult and once we become accustomed to this it will become easier and easier.
OK, So let's go MCIG!!!!!!!!!!!! Onward and Upward
|
|
|
Post by jaketrent4 on Jun 18, 2014 8:41:40 GMT -7
peppa.com/stocks/mm.txtFound this article when googling BMIC MM. Looks like naked shorting because they are assuming that MCIG is a pump and dump. EDIT: Every time I call out a MM they go off of the L2 a couple minutes later even though they been there the whole day. They might be watching forum. lol
|
|
|
Post by grorate25 on Jul 2, 2014 18:32:08 GMT -7
Test! I am in! Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by grundlehunter on Jul 10, 2014 8:25:19 GMT -7
Looks like SLEEKSCAPE has made a new name and is on mCig board again.
I really am starting to hate that board, between monest, sleek, and PITA.. who's name is very appropriate.. It's gotten pretty shitty.
Hopefully some of the good members come back and posts some fun positive conversations.
|
|
|
Post by hobowilly on Jul 10, 2014 11:56:37 GMT -7
Looks like SLEEKSCAPE has made a new name and is on mCig board again. I really am starting to hate that board, between monest, sleek, and PITA.. who's name is very appropriate.. It's gotten pretty shitty. Hopefully some of the good members come back and posts some fun positive conversations. Yeah, and that's the problem. If you don't post a "fun positive conversation" you're labeled a basher. I tried to tone a couple of people down who were posting over the top shit. I asked that they just include an IMO and you came down all over me. Saying next I was going to sell and move in with Sleek. Real funny, and oh yeah, fun and positive. Look in the mirror before you start pointing fingers. Oh wait, look in the mirror AND point a finger
|
|
|
Post by hobowilly on Jul 11, 2014 6:02:42 GMT -7
So one of the bashers has returned. Actually, if you put a "hmmmmmmmmm" in front of his post and a "right?" at the end you couldn't tell one from the other.
I think we all know what's going on here so why play into their hands? Their intentions are not to engage in any real dialogue or to learn anything about MCIG, it's simply to bash, mislead, and create weird logic to make a point and ultimately to make a profit from shorting.
It's Friday, let's try and *NOT* respond for one entire day?
Besides, the mods and admins have obviously been told to delete any posts against them.
Tip of the Day = Don't Engage!!!!!!
OK so if you absolutely, positively can't help yourself and feel you must reply please do it in a "Create New Post" This way you are not responding directly and also you will be denying the SOB his commission on responses.
|
|
|
Post by grundlehunter on Jul 11, 2014 6:37:25 GMT -7
Looks like SLEEKSCAPE has made a new name and is on mCig board again. I really am starting to hate that board, between monest, sleek, and PITA.. who's name is very appropriate.. It's gotten pretty shitty. Hopefully some of the good members come back and posts some fun positive conversations. Yeah, and that's the problem. If you don't post a "fun positive conversation" you're labeled a basher. I tried to tone a couple of people down who were posting over the top shit. I asked that they just include an IMO and you came down all over me. Saying next I was going to sell and move in with Sleek. Real funny, and oh yeah, fun and positive. Look in the mirror before you start pointing fingers. Oh wait, look in the mirror AND point a finger Actually this was my post... "Dam hobo.. You're on a witch hunt lately. Were all bummed that mCig isn't trading at $5 yet but relax. Next your posts will be "I'm out, mCig is garbage, i'm moving in with Sleek" LOL ;-)" Said completely in jest, clearly you missed the "LOL winkey face" You spent the better part of 2 days chasing down anyone who posted anything even remotely positive and were insisting they declare it their opinion. For someone who is advocating for "no engaging" you'd think me, of all people, would not be the target of your frustrations. But hey, obviously sarcasm doesn't come over well via interwebz, no hard feelings on my end, still like the board a lot better without all the bashers (you are not one..). GL everyone
|
|